Ideal Taxes Association

Raymond Richman       -       Jesse Richman       -       Howard Richman

 Richmans' Trade and Taxes Blog



Jobs, Jobs, Jobs - We were published in American Thinker this morning
Howard Richman, 1/15/2010

Here is how we begin:

The economic news for January has been dominated by disappointing employment news released on January 8 by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Total non-farm payroll employment edged down by 85,000 in December from November, led by a loss of 57,000 construction jobs and 27,000 manufacturing jobs. Public dissatisfaction with the Obama administration's handling of the economy has been following employment levels down.Here's how we begin:

Follow the following link to read the commentary: http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/01/jobs_jobs_jobs.html


Comment by Howard Richman, 1/18/2010:

There was a great comment to this article posted by a reader identifying himself as GeorgiaBoy61. Here is a selection:

My late father was a senior executive for a Fortune 500 electronics firm, with extensive international business experience, including managing operations in Japan, China and elsewhere. Beginning in the 1970s, he was very concerned with the position of U.S. manufacturing versus our international competitors, then primarily Japan, but later on China. His experience was that these nations did not conduct trade with the U.S. on an equal basis, and engaged in protectionism and complex schemes of all kinds to effectively prohibit American electronics from their markets, or erect all sorts of bureaucratic and other barriers to slow the entry of our products into their markets. Japan's Ministry of Trade was notrious for doing this. My father passed away in 1999, so did not live to see the powerhouse the PRC has become, but I know he would have been very concerned indeed at the direction things have taken, and the practices of the Chinese government, in terms of manipulating currency, limiting access to markets for our goods, and the like.

"Free trade" and unfettered competition are supported by most conservatives, myself included, but only with the caveat that the game must not be rigged, as it has been for the last three decades, in favor of our trading partners. As Paul Weyrich and Bill Lind note in their book, "The Next Conservatism," international trade that favors our partners at the expense of Americans, should not be one of our policy goals. values. The Globalists may want it, but I certainly do not. Nor should our trading partners want an enfeebled USA, broke and unable to serve its role as the driver of the world economy.

At the very least, trusting the Communist oligarchs of the PRC to act in our best interests with their nation's trade policy is dangerously naive. It is the task of each nation's leaders to maximize trade benefit for that nation, not other nations; the Chinese are doing just that.

Response to this comment by Howard Richman, 1/18/2010:
This comment got us checking out Weyrich & Lind's book, The New Conservatism.
Response to this comment by Howard Richman, 1/18/2010:
People like Weyrich, on the Christian wing of the the Republican Party, are much more receptive toward balanced trade than the etablishment wing.




  • Richmans' Blog    RSS
  • Our New Book - Balanced Trade
  • Buy Trading Away Our Future
  • Read Trading Away Our Future
  • Richmans' Commentaries
  • ITA Working Papers
  • ITA on Facebook
  • Contact Us

    Archive
    Jun 2017
    May 2017
    Apr 2017
    Mar 2017
    Feb 2017
    Jan 2017
    Dec 2016
    Nov 2016
    Oct 2016
    Sep 2016
    Aug 2016
    Jul 2016
    Jun 2016
    May 2016
    Apr 2016
    Mar 2016
    Feb 2016
    Jan 2016
    Dec 2015
    Nov 2015
    Oct 2015
    Sep 2015
    Aug 2015
    Jul 2015
    Jun 2015
    May 2015
    Apr 2015
    Mar 2015
    Feb 2015
    Jan 2015
    Dec 2014
    Nov 2014
    Oct 2014
    Sep 2014
    Aug 2014
    Jul 2014
    Jun 2014
    May 2014
    Apr 2014
    Mar 2014
    Feb 2014
    Jan 2014
    Dec 2013
    Nov 2013
    Oct 2013
    Sep 2013
    Aug 2013
    Jul 2013
    Jun 2013
    May 2013
    Apr 2013
    Mar 2013
    Feb 2013
    Jan 2013
    Dec 2012
    Nov 2012
    Oct 2012
    Sep 2012
    Aug 2012
    Jul 2012
    Jun 2012
    May 2012
    Apr 2012
    Mar 2012
    Feb 2012
    Jan 2012
    Dec 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010

    Outside Links:

  • American Economic Alert
  • American Jobs Alliance
  • Angry Bear Blog
  • Economy in Crisis
  • Econbrowser
  • Emmanuel Goldstein's Blog
  • Levy Economics Institute
  • McKeever Institute
  • Michael Pettis Blog
  • Naked Capitalism
  • Natural Born Conservative
  • Science & Public Policy Inst.
  • TradeReform.org
  • Votersway Blog
  • Watt's Up With That


    Wikipedia:

  • [An] extensive argument for balanced trade, and a program to achieve balanced trade is presented in Trading Away Our Future, by Raymond Richman, Howard Richman and Jesse Richman. “A minimum standard for ensuring that trade does benefit all is that trade should be relatively in balance.” [Balanced Trade entry]

    Journal of Economic Literature:

  • [Trading Away Our Future] Examines the costs and benefits of U.S. trade and tax policies. Discusses why trade deficits matter; root of the trade deficit; the “ostrich” and “eagles” attitudes; how to balance trade; taxation of capital gains; the real estate tax; the corporate income tax; solving the low savings problem; how to protect one’s assets; and a program for a strong America....

    Atlantic Economic Journal:

  • In Trading Away Our Future   Richman ... advocates the immediate adoption of a set of public policy proposal designed to reduce the trade deficit and increase domestic savings.... the set of public policy proposals is a wake-up call... [February 17, 2009 review by T.H. Cate]