Raymond Richman - Jesse Richman - Howard Richman
Richmans' Trade and Taxes Blog
U.S. Trade Deficit Still Growing
On Thursday, the Bureau of Economic Analysis released trade statistics which showed that the U.S. trade deficit fell in July. But the July data was along the same upward trend line as the February through May data.
The following chart shows the monthly U.S. trade deficits from 2009 (blue) and 2010 (red). This is the full trade deficit, including both goods and services, and has been calculated on a seasonally adjusted basis:
About half of our trade deficit is our goods trade deficit with China. It is intentionally produced by the Chinese government as part of its successful mercantilist strategy, designed to maximize exports and minimize imports. That strategy was explored by Peking University professor Heng-Fu Zou in his article, Dynamic Analysis of the Viner Model of Mercantilism which appeared in the 1997 volume of Journal of International Money and Finance, and then implemented by the Chinese government at the beginning of this decade. Seeing the Chinese success, many other governments have been implementing the same mercantilist strategy.
The Chinese government uses yuan to buy dollars in foreign exchange markets to prevent the yuan from rising and the dollar from falling to a trade-balancing level. Then it loans those dollars to Americans. At the same time, it takes various measures to keep out American imports (tariffs, purchasing restrictions, freely permitting piracy while delaying legitimate items, etc.). Here is our trade deficit in just goods (not services) with China, not seasonally adjusted:
During the near-term, the mercantilist country loses consumption while the victim country gains it. For example, the Chinese worker has remained poor, despite the rapidly growing Chinese GDP. Meanwhile, in the United States, mercantilist governments supplied the loans which allowed the American consumer to borrow and live beyond his means until our housing bubble burst in 2006. During the Obama administration mercantilists have been supplying the loans which have been allowing the federal government to live beyond its means without causing much change in long-term interest rates.
But in the long run, the opposite happens: the mercantilist country gains consumption and the victim country loses it. China has been growing by about 10% per year. Meanwhile, its victim, the United States, loses industries, goes into debt, and its growth slows. The eventual result, as John Maynard Keynes predicted in his magnum opus, is a perpetual state of depression in the victim country, a state that we entered in the United States in the fourth quarter of 2007.
The Obama administration has been relying upon ineffective talk to persuade China to switch from the policies that have caused its economy to grow and ours to falter. Meanwhile China has been politely ignoring whatever Obama says. For example, last weekend President Obama dispatched Lawrence Summers to China to try to persuade the Chinese government to let its currency strengthen vs. the dollar. The Chinese government gave Summers the royal treatment, including meetings with the head of the People's Bank of China and the Chinese President, but they did not make any concessions. Robert E. Scott, writing in the Huffington Post (Summers brings back bubkes from Beijing), wrote:
Now it's up to Congress to decide whether they want to continue to enable mercantilism. There are several excellent proposals on the table that would take the profit out of it. For example, University of Maryland economist Peter Morici (Obama, Pelosi Neglect of Trade Deficit Imperils Recovery) proposes a tax on mercantilist currency conversions. We propose a scaled tariff (U.S. Growth Slows Due to Trade Deficit) on our imports from mercantilist countries.
Congress is being held accountable by the American voter for the state of the American economy. The Democrats have been pretending to be concerned about the trade deficits, but when they have power, they do nothing. The Republican leadership does not even pretend to be concerned. Both parties need to decide whether or not they will continue Trading Away Our Future.
Comment by Mike from NYC, 9/11/2010: Unfortunately China is not the only 'villain' in the trade imbalance problem. Much of the blame can be laid at the feet of so-called American companies and capitalists who closed factories in the US and shipped the factories and manufacturing to China. Please name anything Black & Decker manufactures in the USA anymore. And how about WalMart? And what about Sears? The list is endless. Consider this: Corning is building a $800 MILLION factory in China and NOT in the US. American 'industrialists' of today are not the industrialists and captains of industry who led America to greatness. By and large they are mercantilists whose primary and sole aim is profits at any cost no matter the damage done to America. Let's face it - the 'heartbeat of America' has been ripped out and replaced with basically nothing. It was America's industrial sector that made America successful and despite all the rhetoric by politicians and capitalists there is nothing to replace it. The 'financial sector' did NOT make America so successful - it was factories and factory workers.
Journal of Economic Literature:
Atlantic Economic Journal: