Ideal Taxes Association

Raymond Richman       -       Jesse Richman       -       Howard Richman

 Richmans' Trade and Taxes Blog



Why Lt. Gen. Clapper, Director of National Intelligence, Is Being Belittled
Raymond Richman, 3/24/2011

Air Force Lt. Gen. James R. Clapper was alleged in the media to have “flunked ABCs' quiz”  about a London terror case in which a dozen suspected terrorists were rounded up a few hours earlier. Diane Sawyer, who asked what he knew about the roundup, was shocked, shocked, shocked! that he had not been informed about the incident.   Participating in the interview with Gen. Clapper were Homeland Security Chief Janet Napolitano and white house terrorism chief John Brennan, who had read the Post or had been briefed, as they should have been, involved as they were in terrorist matters. The interview on a Monday morning aired on the following Tuesday evening. Gen. Clapper, like Sarah Palin, does not apparently read the Post first thing every morning during breakfast.

Should Gen. Clapper have been alerted to the story by his staff? Yes, if they brief him every morning about what’s in the press and if they met with him that morning. But they did not. What’s the shock; what’s the surprise? It was news to Diane Sawyer and her question was legitimate but she did not ask him if he was aware of the roundup. She just assumed that because she knew about it, surely Gen. Clapper did, too.

Gen. Clapper was accused of another faux pas when asked in another interview his opinion of the Muslim Brotherhood. In his reply, he said he considered the Brotherhood to be a secular and moderate group.  One could take exception to this view as did Israeli journalist Barry Rubin, author of The Muslim Brotherhood, the Organization and Policies of a Global Islamist Movement. He considered our national intelligence staff to be naïve if that is what believe about the Brotherhood. We, too, believe the Brotherhood is a dangerous over- and undercover Islamist group striving for power throughout the Moslem world. But we would not write as Barry Rubin did that, “I’m willing to bet (though admittedly without evidence) that the word around the CIA is that this guy is a fool and an embarrassment and that his staff trembles every time he opens his mouth.” Rubin believes the Obama administration should listen more to Secretary of State Hilary Clinton and Secretary of Defense Robert Gates. But Clinton and Gates advocated different policies respecting Libya, Clinton pressing for intervention and Gates opposing it before the fact, while supporting the administration after the fact, which is his political obligation as a member of the President's cabinet.  

And the media made fun of Gen. Clapper  who, when asked what country was the greatest threat to the U.S.,  replied, "China." We believe that, too,  but he was expected to answer, "Iran." The press believed his answer was an affront to the Chinese and therefore politically incorrect and that the administration considers Iran an enemy, and he should have helped with administration policy. We believe the Director of National Intelligence should tell the truth or refuse to answer. He should not be a propagandist.

Lt. Gen. Clapper was Director of  the National Geospatial Intelligence Agency from 2001-2006, head of the Defense Intelligence Agency from 1992-1995. He commanded Signals Intelligence in Thailand where he flew 73 combat support missions in EC47s, and he served as Director of Intelligence for three unified commands, US. Forces Korea, US Pacific Command, and Strategic Air Command. Making fun of him as a naive bumbling fool is belied by his distinguished career in intelligence.

Your Name:

Post a Comment:


Comment by macfan, 3/25/2011:

The news of the terror arrests you refer to didn't make into the newspapers until the 21st. The interview took place on the 20th. So even if Clapper had read the front page of the post while eating his bowl of cereal it was there for him to read.

 




  • Richmans' Blog    RSS
  • Our New Book - Balanced Trade
  • Buy Trading Away Our Future
  • Read Trading Away Our Future
  • Richmans' Commentaries
  • ITA Working Papers
  • ITA on Facebook
  • Contact Us

    Archive
    Aug 2017
    Jul 2017
    Jun 2017
    May 2017
    Apr 2017
    Mar 2017
    Feb 2017
    Jan 2017
    Dec 2016
    Nov 2016
    Oct 2016
    Sep 2016
    Aug 2016
    Jul 2016
    Jun 2016
    May 2016
    Apr 2016
    Mar 2016
    Feb 2016
    Jan 2016
    Dec 2015
    Nov 2015
    Oct 2015
    Sep 2015
    Aug 2015
    Jul 2015
    Jun 2015
    May 2015
    Apr 2015
    Mar 2015
    Feb 2015
    Jan 2015
    Dec 2014
    Nov 2014
    Oct 2014
    Sep 2014
    Aug 2014
    Jul 2014
    Jun 2014
    May 2014
    Apr 2014
    Mar 2014
    Feb 2014
    Jan 2014
    Dec 2013
    Nov 2013
    Oct 2013
    Sep 2013
    Aug 2013
    Jul 2013
    Jun 2013
    May 2013
    Apr 2013
    Mar 2013
    Feb 2013
    Jan 2013
    Dec 2012
    Nov 2012
    Oct 2012
    Sep 2012
    Aug 2012
    Jul 2012
    Jun 2012
    May 2012
    Apr 2012
    Mar 2012
    Feb 2012
    Jan 2012
    Dec 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March

    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010

    Categories:
    Book Reviews
    Capital Gains Taxation
    Corporate Income Tax
    Consumption Taxes
    Economy - Long Term
    Economy - Short Term
    Environmental Regulation
    Real Estate Taxation
    Trade
    Miscellaneous

    Outside Links:

  • American Economic Alert
  • American Jobs Alliance
  • Angry Bear Blog
  • Economy in Crisis
  • Econbrowser
  • Emmanuel Goldstein's Blog
  • Levy Economics Institute
  • McKeever Institute
  • Michael Pettis Blog
  • Naked Capitalism
  • Natural Born Conservative
  • Science & Public Policy Inst.
  • TradeReform.org
  • Votersway Blog
  • Watt's Up With That


    Wikipedia:

  • [An] extensive argument for balanced trade, and a program to achieve balanced trade is presented in Trading Away Our Future, by Raymond Richman, Howard Richman and Jesse Richman. “A minimum standard for ensuring that trade does benefit all is that trade should be relatively in balance.” [Balanced Trade entry]

    Journal of Economic Literature:

  • [Trading Away Our Future] Examines the costs and benefits of U.S. trade and tax policies. Discusses why trade deficits matter; root of the trade deficit; the “ostrich” and “eagles” attitudes; how to balance trade; taxation of capital gains; the real estate tax; the corporate income tax; solving the low savings problem; how to protect one’s assets; and a program for a strong America....

    Atlantic Economic Journal:

  • In Trading Away Our Future   Richman ... advocates the immediate adoption of a set of public policy proposal designed to reduce the trade deficit and increase domestic savings.... the set of public policy proposals is a wake-up call... [February 17, 2009 review by T.H. Cate]