Ideal Taxes Association

Raymond Richman       -       Jesse Richman       -       Howard Richman

 Richmans' Trade and Taxes Blog



Defining Away the Trade Deficit?
Jesse Richman, 9/6/2013

http://www.tradereform.org/2013/08/globalization-forces-major-change-in-business-classification-system-one-result-will-be-that-imports-from-manufacturers-that-have-outsourced-production-offshore-will-no-longer-be-considered-imports/

Tradereform.org flags a counter-intuitive change in regulations that seems on its face to make no sense.  The reclassification of products produced abroad by U.S. multi-national companies so that these products are counted as U.S. manufacturing production and not imports.

China has been urging this kind of reclassification for years, arguing that if goods produced in China by offshoring US companies were counted as US production, then there is little trade deficit.

The fundamental question is whether this production IS American production. It’s produced by Chinese workers, in factories located in China. The factories are under Chinese law, and can be seized by China if it’s government determines such seizure to be lawful. It doesn’t seem to be American production to me, in fact I cannot come up with any way to define it as American production that doesn't do violence to the geographical facts.

Some examples from a BLS report (http://www.upjohn.org/MEG/papers/Doherty_Reflecting%20Factoryless%20GoodsProduction.pdf).

"The value of products that have remained in a foreign MSP’s country or were shipped via a foreign MSP to another country will be added to exports."

What this seems to mean is that a corporation that is defined as "American" leases the design for a toy from a designer in Tokyo, and then contracts with a company in China to produce the toy, while providing some direction to them about what imputs to purchase, and then sell the toy in India, it is a U.S. manufacturing export (after the costs paid to the Chinese manufacturer are netted out). 

In addition to the simple oddity of a product with almost no connection with the US being tabulated as a U.S. export, there are other difficult aspects.  One tricky factor is how one is to define a corporation as American in this context.  What if it has no U.S. operations beyond a shell corporation that has leased rights to the design and is nominally charged with distribution even though nearly all employees are operating in other countries?  The boundaries are tricky here.  Also, since the good that is 'exported' never crosses US borders, it seems to me that it may be rather hard to get any reliable accounting of it.

Given these difficulties I'm not surprised that implementation delays have resulted in a delayed roll out of the new definition.  Indeed, it seems rife with loopholes that could be used to create fictitious U.S. exports and obscure the volume of U.S. imports.   

Another odd aspect is the treatment of goods that are manufactured in the U.S. for a foreign company.  These now become imports.

"The full value of the products that they transformed that remain in the U.S. are included in imports."

So when an American company affiliated with Toyota expands manufacturing in West Virginia or Tennessee (http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/08/30/3596215/toyota-to-boost-transmission-production.html) they are probably adding to the U.S. trade deficit under this new definition!

This seems fantastical.  Unfortunately, it doesn't appear that it is.

Your Name:

Post a Comment:




  • Richmans' Blog    RSS
  • Our New Book - Balanced Trade
  • Buy Trading Away Our Future
  • Read Trading Away Our Future
  • Richmans' Commentaries
  • ITA Working Papers
  • ITA on Facebook
  • Contact Us

    Archive
    Mar 2017
    Feb 2017
    Jan 2017
    Dec 2016
    Nov 2016
    Oct 2016
    Sep 2016
    Aug 2016
    Jul 2016
    Jun 2016
    May 2016
    Apr 2016
    Mar 2016
    Feb 2016
    Jan 2016
    Dec 2015
    Nov 2015
    Oct 2015
    Sep 2015
    Aug 2015
    Jul 2015
    Jun 2015
    May 2015
    Apr 2015
    Mar 2015
    Feb 2015
    Jan 2015
    Dec 2014
    Nov 2014
    Oct 2014
    Sep 2014
    Aug 2014
    Jul 2014
    Jun 2014
    May 2014
    Apr 2014
    Mar 2014
    Feb 2014
    Jan 2014
    Dec 2013
    Nov 2013
    Oct 2013
    Sep 2013

    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010

    Categories:
    Book Reviews
    Capital Gains Taxation
    Corporate Income Tax
    Consumption Taxes
    Economy - Long Term
    Economy - Short Term
    Environmental Regulation
    Real Estate Taxation
    Trade

    Miscellaneous

    Outside Links:

  • American Economic Alert
  • American Jobs Alliance
  • Angry Bear Blog
  • Economy in Crisis
  • Econbrowser
  • Emmanuel Goldstein's Blog
  • Levy Economics Institute
  • McKeever Institute
  • Michael Pettis Blog
  • Naked Capitalism
  • Natural Born Conservative
  • Science & Public Policy Inst.
  • TradeReform.org
  • Votersway Blog
  • Watt's Up With That


    Wikipedia:

  • [An] extensive argument for balanced trade, and a program to achieve balanced trade is presented in Trading Away Our Future, by Raymond Richman, Howard Richman and Jesse Richman. “A minimum standard for ensuring that trade does benefit all is that trade should be relatively in balance.” [Balanced Trade entry]

    Journal of Economic Literature:

  • [Trading Away Our Future] Examines the costs and benefits of U.S. trade and tax policies. Discusses why trade deficits matter; root of the trade deficit; the “ostrich” and “eagles” attitudes; how to balance trade; taxation of capital gains; the real estate tax; the corporate income tax; solving the low savings problem; how to protect one’s assets; and a program for a strong America....

    Atlantic Economic Journal:

  • In Trading Away Our Future   Richman ... advocates the immediate adoption of a set of public policy proposal designed to reduce the trade deficit and increase domestic savings.... the set of public policy proposals is a wake-up call... [February 17, 2009 review by T.H. Cate]