Ideal Taxes Association

Raymond Richman       -       Jesse Richman       -       Howard Richman

 Richmans' Trade and Taxes Blog



World Economic Growth is Slowing
Howard Richman, 11/24/2013

I suspected that world economic growth was slowing when gasoline prices started to decline this fall. My hypothesis has been that short-term changes in world oil prices are largely driven by changes in world-wide demand, not supply. When the world economy is growing, world oil prices tend to rise. When the world economy is slowing, oil prices tend to fall. Thus the price you pay at your local gas station is one of the chief indicators of world economic demand. But falling oil prices could have other causes as well. Perhaps an increase in Iranian oil production, due to the lifting of sanctions, was causing them to fall.

My suspicions of a worldwide demand slowdown were given support by the latest report of United States trade. In September 2013, U.S. exports fell by $3.0 billion, on a seasonally adjusted basis, from $191.9 billion the previous quarter. When worldwide demand declines, demand for U.S. exports tends to decline. But a one-month decline in exports does not a trend make. This decline could have been an aberration.

My suspicions were confirmed by a November 19 report from the OECD, one of the organizations that tracks world economic data. It predicts that, by the time growth is calculated for 2013, world economic growth will increase just 2.7% this year, down from a 3.1% increase last year. There appears to be a consistent trend of declining world economic growth:

  • 2010 - 4.9% growth
  • 2011 - 3.7% growth
  • 2012 - 3.1% growth
  • 2013 - 2.7% growth

The OECD statistics also show that U.S. growth is stagnating well below its usual 3% level:

  • 2010 - 2.4% growth
  • 2011 - 1.8% growth
  • 2012 - 2.8% growth
  • 2013 - 1.7% growth

So why is world economic growth slowing? One reason is the large and persistent trade deficits being experienced by many of the world's countries. Not only do persistent deficits sap jobs and take away investment opportunities, but they eventually cause financial collapse. Moreover, a world trading system with the same trade-surplus and trade-deficit countries year after year is not sustainable. Eventually, the trade deficit countries go into financial crisis which spoils the markets for the trade surplus countries.

In the fall of 2008, the United States experienced the financial crisis that results from trade deficits. With the collapse of the house price bubble, consumers could no longer afford to pay back the loans on their houses, originating from abroad, that had financed their purchases of imports, and American banks were left holding the bag.

For the past two years the southern eurozone countries (France, Italy, Spain, Portugal and Greece) have been enmeshed in trade-deficit caused depressions, which are hurting their imports from the northern eurozone countries. This year will be the second year in a row that real GDP growth in the eurozone was negative (-0.6% in 2012, -0.4% in 2013). There is an obvious solution. The Southern European countries should pull out of the euro and re-adopt their old currencies. Then their currencies would fall to trade balancing levels and they would get trade-balancing investment in their trade-competing industries.

In the rest of the world, the problem is that the East Asian governments, especially China and Japan, have been continuing their mercantilist currency manipulations in order to run trade surpluses with their trading partners. The U.S. trade balance with China has continued to worsen. Our merchandise trade balance with China just set a new negative record of $321.0 billion over the last twelve months, as shown in the following graph:

There is an obvious solution. The U.S. should adopt a scaled tariff upon the products of the trade-surplus currency-manipulating countries which would force them to either take down their barriers to U.S. exports or lose their share of the U.S. market.

But, instead, Federal Reserve Chair Ben Bernanke's has been buying U.S. long-term bonds (a strategy called "Quantitative Easing"), partly to weaken the dollar by sending private savings abroad so as to keep U.S. trade deficits from growing. This has been transferring some of the savings being forced into the U.S. economy by the mercantilist governments onto innocent bystanders.

Bernanke's strategy helped the United States for a while. An improving U.S. trade balance with the innocent bystandards offset the deteriorating U.S. trade balance with the mercantilists. But now Bernanke's strategy is forcing some of these bystanders into financial crises, which are starting to hurt U.S. exports. According to the OECD report:

Reinforced by concerns about growth slowdowns and the sustainability of high external [trade] deficits and political tensions in some economies, large portfolio investment outflows contributed to tighter liquidity conditions, sharp declines in bond and stock prices, and sizable currency depreciations. This was especially marked in Brazil, India, Indonesia, South Africa and Turkey, all countries with large external financing needs... 

The United States economy will experience a double-whammy in 2014. Not only will U.S. exports to the innocent bystanders fall, but Obamacare is likely to cause declining aggregate supply of services by those small businesses and self-employed people who are trying to avoid Obamacare penalties.

Don't pay any attention to rosy predictions for rapid economic growth in 2014. For example, the OECD is predicting that the U.S. economy will grow by 2.9% and that the world economy will grow by 3.6%. But last year, at this time, it was predicting 2.0% U.S. growth, not the actual 1.7%, and 3.4% world growth, not the actual 2.7%. The best prediction is that current trends will continue: The world will continue to experience slower economic growth in 2014, while U.S. economic growth will continue to stagnate.

Your Name:

Post a Comment:




  • Richmans' Blog    RSS
  • Our New Book - Balanced Trade
  • Buy Trading Away Our Future
  • Read Trading Away Our Future
  • Richmans' Commentaries
  • ITA Working Papers
  • ITA on Facebook
  • Contact Us

    Archive
    May 2017
    Apr 2017
    Mar 2017
    Feb 2017
    Jan 2017
    Dec 2016
    Nov 2016
    Oct 2016
    Sep 2016
    Aug 2016
    Jul 2016
    Jun 2016
    May 2016
    Apr 2016
    Mar 2016
    Feb 2016
    Jan 2016
    Dec 2015
    Nov 2015
    Oct 2015
    Sep 2015
    Aug 2015
    Jul 2015
    Jun 2015
    May 2015
    Apr 2015
    Mar 2015
    Feb 2015
    Jan 2015
    Dec 2014
    Nov 2014
    Oct 2014
    Sep 2014
    Aug 2014
    Jul 2014
    Jun 2014
    May 2014
    Apr 2014
    Mar 2014
    Feb 2014
    Jan 2014
    Dec 2013
    Nov 2013

    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010

    Categories:
    Book Reviews
    Capital Gains Taxation
    Corporate Income Tax
    Consumption Taxes
    Economy - Long Term
    Economy - Short Term

    Environmental Regulation
    Real Estate Taxation
    Trade
    Miscellaneous

    Outside Links:

  • American Economic Alert
  • American Jobs Alliance
  • Angry Bear Blog
  • Economy in Crisis
  • Econbrowser
  • Emmanuel Goldstein's Blog
  • Levy Economics Institute
  • McKeever Institute
  • Michael Pettis Blog
  • Naked Capitalism
  • Natural Born Conservative
  • Science & Public Policy Inst.
  • TradeReform.org
  • Votersway Blog
  • Watt's Up With That


    Wikipedia:

  • [An] extensive argument for balanced trade, and a program to achieve balanced trade is presented in Trading Away Our Future, by Raymond Richman, Howard Richman and Jesse Richman. “A minimum standard for ensuring that trade does benefit all is that trade should be relatively in balance.” [Balanced Trade entry]

    Journal of Economic Literature:

  • [Trading Away Our Future] Examines the costs and benefits of U.S. trade and tax policies. Discusses why trade deficits matter; root of the trade deficit; the “ostrich” and “eagles” attitudes; how to balance trade; taxation of capital gains; the real estate tax; the corporate income tax; solving the low savings problem; how to protect one’s assets; and a program for a strong America....

    Atlantic Economic Journal:

  • In Trading Away Our Future   Richman ... advocates the immediate adoption of a set of public policy proposal designed to reduce the trade deficit and increase domestic savings.... the set of public policy proposals is a wake-up call... [February 17, 2009 review by T.H. Cate]