Raymond Richman - Jesse Richman - Howard Richman
Richmans' Trade and Taxes Blog
Inversion Deals -- Corporate Income Tax Flight Continues
The United States has noncompetitive corporate income tax rates which create powerful incentives for US companies, aided by hedge funds and Wall Street banks, to flee the country. A recent story in Forbes highlights the developing trend, and some of the key players in the effort to get Burger King a Canadian passport.
The U.S. corporate income tax rate is politically hard to touch because people like the idea of taxing big money corporations at high rates. But it is economically unsustainable, and needs to be significantly replaced by a VAT or some other tax that is less readily avoided. The move of even Burger King to abandon its U.S. corporate citizenship suggests just how important it is to break this political stalemate and reform the tax code.
U.S. corporate tax rates are quite high compared with the rest of the world. Canada's tax rate is 15 percent versus the U.S. rate of 35 percent, hence the attraction of a move north for Burger King.
High corporate tax rates exacerbate the U.S. trade deficit in multiple ways. For instance:
1. They make it hard for truly U.S. corporations to compete internationally. U.S. producers are at a disadvantage relative to foreign concerns paying less tax, and their products are correspondingly either less profitable or less price-competitive.
2. International competitors pay less tax on their profits than U.S. firms, leaving less to reinvest in new plant, equipment, technology, research, and training to retain competitiveness.
3. They encourage corporations to move at least some operations overseas so that tax-shifting strategies can be used to reduce the U.S. tax burden.
By exacerbating the trade deficit, high corporate tax rates contribute to a range of economic problems including increased income inequality, diminished standards of living, increasing international indebtedness, reduces industrial competitiveness, and more.
The flight of even retail establishments to foreign destinations may have perverse effects on the way the burden of corporate income taxes are borne, encouraging more firms to flee. If all firms in an economy are taxed equally, then a large portion of the tax burden (just how much is a matter of controversy) tends to be shifted forward to consumers. You pay higher prices for burgers today because McDonald's, Wendy's and Burger King are all paying corporate taxes on the profits of that sale, and they incorporate the fact that they will be paying taxes into their prices in order to still earn a competitive return for their investors. But if Burger King doesn't have to price in as much of the cost of U.S. corporate taxes, then McDonald's and Wendy's may have to price accordingly. This could be good for consumers, but it will hurt U.S. tax collections as firms with lower tax burdens are advantaged over time.
The solution to high corporate tax rates is quite simple. Cut the tax rates and replace them with something that creates less economic distortion. A good candidate to replace lost corporate income tax collections is the Value Added Tax. This tax is collected for companies as they 'add value' to products. But unlike the corporate income tax it is border adjustable meaning that it will fall equally on importers, exporters, and import-competing firms.
Economy - Long Term
Economy - Short Term
Last 100 Years
Real Estate Taxation
Journal of Economic Literature:
Atlantic Economic Journal: