Raymond Richman - Jesse Richman - Howard Richman
Richmans' Trade and Taxes Blog
US Economic Growth 2.7% over last year. China about same.
On December 23, the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) of the Commerce Department issued its latest revision of U.S. economic growth during the third quarter period (July through September) of 2014. According to the BEA, the U.S. economy grew at a 5.0% annual rate during that quarter.
A more accurate estimate of the U.S. growth rate can be found by comparing each quarter with the quarter one year earlier. If the third quarter of 2014 is compared with the third quarter of 2013, the growth rate was 2.7%, not 5.0%, as shown in the graph below.
Unfortunately, the once honorable Bureau of Economic Analysis of the Census Bureau tweaked the quarterly GDP numbers in order to achieve the supposedly high growth rate. This tweaking was predicted by Tyler Durden of zerohedge.com.
When Durden analyzed the final revision for the first quarter back on June 25 (Here's the reason for the total collapse in Q1 GDP), he discovered that Obamacare payments had been removed by the BEA from the already dismal results for the first quarter. He predicted that they would be added to later quarters in order to achieve 5% growth during a quarter. Specifically, he wrote:
That is exactly what happened. Durden concluded his December 23 posting (Here's the reason for the "surge" in Q3 GDP):
Under the Obama administration, the U.S. government has been moving toward the Chinese standard for statistics reporting. In China, government officials specify what they want the GDP growth rate to be and it is the job of statisticians to achieve the desired numbers.
In an interview with Barrons' recently, Anne Stevenson-Yang, a research director of J Capital, discussed the validity of Chinese economic statistics. She said:
Currently, the official Chinese GDP numbers show 7.3% growth in real GDP from the third quarter of 2013 to the third quarter of 2014. In general, GDP growth is accompanied by corresponding growth in demand for imports. But here's a graph of Chinese imports. It shows imports growing steadily until February 2014, and then leveling off.
As shown in the above graph, Chinese imports for the year ending in November were the following:
Thus Chinese imports only grew at a 1.6% clip for the year ending November 2014. as compared to 7.1% for the previous year, and 4.7% for the year before that.
Imports are a particularly difficult statistic to fudge, since each entry appears as imports on the Chinese books and as exports on the books of a Chinese trading partner. The import statistics suggest very little growth in the Chinese economy since February.
Other statistics are necessary in order to determine if the import statistics are representative of Chinese GDP. In a Barrons' interview, Stevenson-Yang cited Chinese indicators which have actually been declining lately:
Stephenson-Yang said she would be "shocked" if Chinese real GDP was actually growing faster than 4%, a much lower statistic than the official 7.3%. China's economic slowdown could partly explain rapidly falling world oil prices and the downward trend over the last six months in aluminum, copper, lead, nickle and zinc prices.
It is possible that lower oil prices will increase both world aggregate demand and world aggregate supply in 2015. After all, lower oil prices will leave more money in consumers' hands reduce business costs. Alternatively, the fall in world demand that is causing the fall in commodity prices could could prelude a Chinese recession and, possibly, a worldwide recession.
Don't be fooled by false statistics about a rosy present, coming from both the U.S. and Chinese governments. Both countries are only experiencing slow economic growth at the moment.
Last 100 Years
Real Estate Taxation
Journal of Economic Literature:
Atlantic Economic Journal: