Ideal Taxes Association

Raymond Richman       -       Jesse Richman       -       Howard Richman

 Richmans' Trade and Taxes Blog



The Scaled Tariff, a Single Country Variable Tariff, Is All That Is Needed to Balance Trade
Raymond Richman, 1/25/2017

Trump is being importuned to impose a border tax. A border tax is foolish and unnecessary. In the first place, it applies to all our trading partners even those with whom we enjoy a chronic trade surplus. The problem that needs correction are our chronic trade deficits with a handful of countries that has impoverished millions of American manufacturing workers. That is easily corrected by scaled tariffs which rise and fall automatically as the trade deficit widens or contracts. The scaled tariff is a single country variable tariff which has the virtue of raising huge amounts of revenue so long as the trade deficit remains substantial.

The scaled tariff requires no new bureaucracy because tariffs already exist and are administered by an existing revenue authority.  A border tariff is a new tax and will require a new bureaucracy to determine how large it should be and to administer it.  A border tax imposed on imports from countries with whom we have a trade surplus is an undesirable mercantilist policy on our part, something we oppose when others do it. International law recognizes the right of nations to impose tariffs for the purpose of correcting a trade deficit.

 Trade deficits have a number of causes ranging from difference in countries’ savings rates, unjustified wage differences, unjustified barriers to imports and subsidies to exports, and exchange rate manipulation, inter alia.  Regardless of their cause, countries have the right to impose tariffs so long as the trade deficits continue.

The U.S. government  has the obligation to ensure balanced trade with every major trading partner over the long-run. Balanced trade is always beneficial to all trading partners in the long-run. Unbalanced trade is often beneficial to countries importing capital goods to produce more goods or new goods for their own residents. Many of the countries with which we have a favorable balance of trade are in this category.

What we want to avoid is the practice of some of our trading partners to secure a favorable balance of trade with us in order to gain a competitive advantage at the expense of our workers and manufacturers. It is no secret who they are. In 2014, the US trade deficit with the rest of the world amounted to $727 billion. Our trade with China accounted for $343 billion or 47%  of the total, Germany $73.9 billion or 10.2%,  Japan $67.2  or 9.2%, Canada $35 billion or 4.9%, Mexico $53.8 or 7.4 percent, Saudi Arabia $28.3 or 3.9%, Italy $25.1 or 3.5%, South Korea $25.0 billion or 3.4%, India $22.6 billion or 3.1%, and France $15.6 billion or 2.1%. These countries account for nearly 95% of our total trade deficit.

By contrast, we had a surplus with Hong Kong of $35.0 billion, the Netherlands of $22.3 billion,  Belgium of $13.9 billion, with Singapore of $13.8 billion, and with Brazil of $11.9  billion. There is no reason why we should impose tariffs or other barriers on our trade with countries with which we have a trade surplus.

Trump needs to depend on rules rather than negotiate concessions. Making a deal involves jaw-boning, giving up some of what you desire to get as much of what you desire as possible. Our Scaled Tariff is all that is needed and requires no consent from anyone and is permitted under international law. Trump, a great deal-maker develops persuasive arguments supporting his desires. But it creates uncertainty, whereas the scaled tariff is certain to be invoked if countries pursue for any reason policies to beggar American workers.

The office of Trade representative should be re-titled as the office of crony-capitalism. In order to reach a trade agreement, boath parties seek advantages in the form of low duties and open markets but so do our trading partners.  If one of our industries benefits, it is likely to be at the expense of some rent-holder in the other country and vice-versa. A trade agreement necessarily has winners and losers in each country. Crony capitalists benefit in each, opposition capitalists lose in each. Some truths Trump must recognize. Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Bureaucats should have little discretion is deciding who benefits and who bears the burdens. The basis of all corruption of government officials is their ability to make you rich or poor. Bureaucrats should not have only the power to enforce rules. Crony-capitalism is at the heart of all corruption.  

Your Name:

Post a Comment:


Comment by R Holt, 5/19/2017:

Great idea.  How do we get the corrupt politicians to implement it?




  • Richmans' Blog    RSS
  • Our New Book - Balanced Trade
  • Buy Trading Away Our Future
  • Read Trading Away Our Future
  • Richmans' Commentaries
  • ITA Working Papers
  • ITA on Facebook
  • Contact Us

    Archive
    Jun 2017
    May 2017
    Apr 2017
    Mar 2017
    Feb 2017
    Jan 2017

    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010

    Categories:
    Book Reviews
    Capital Gains Taxation
    Corporate Income Tax
    Consumption Taxes
    Economy - Long Term
    Economy - Short Term
    Environmental Regulation
    Real Estate Taxation
    Trade

    Miscellaneous

    Outside Links:

  • American Economic Alert
  • American Jobs Alliance
  • Angry Bear Blog
  • Economy in Crisis
  • Econbrowser
  • Emmanuel Goldstein's Blog
  • Levy Economics Institute
  • McKeever Institute
  • Michael Pettis Blog
  • Naked Capitalism
  • Natural Born Conservative
  • Science & Public Policy Inst.
  • TradeReform.org
  • Votersway Blog
  • Watt's Up With That


    Wikipedia:

  • [An] extensive argument for balanced trade, and a program to achieve balanced trade is presented in Trading Away Our Future, by Raymond Richman, Howard Richman and Jesse Richman. “A minimum standard for ensuring that trade does benefit all is that trade should be relatively in balance.” [Balanced Trade entry]

    Journal of Economic Literature:

  • [Trading Away Our Future] Examines the costs and benefits of U.S. trade and tax policies. Discusses why trade deficits matter; root of the trade deficit; the “ostrich” and “eagles” attitudes; how to balance trade; taxation of capital gains; the real estate tax; the corporate income tax; solving the low savings problem; how to protect one’s assets; and a program for a strong America....

    Atlantic Economic Journal:

  • In Trading Away Our Future   Richman ... advocates the immediate adoption of a set of public policy proposal designed to reduce the trade deficit and increase domestic savings.... the set of public policy proposals is a wake-up call... [February 17, 2009 review by T.H. Cate]