Ideal Taxes Association

Raymond Richman       -       Jesse Richman       -       Howard Richman

 Richmans' Trade and Taxes Blog



Letter to Prof. Martin Feldstein of Harvard U
Raymond Richman, 1/4/2019

The following is a copy of a letter I sent to Prof. Martin Feldstein of Harvard that I thought many of you would be interested in.

I’ve been an admirer of Prof Martin Feldstein for many years but his op-ed in the Wall Street Journal, “Tariffs Should Target Chinese Lawlessness, Not the Trade Deficit” (12//28/2018) has got it exactly backwards. Tariffs should not be used as punishment for lawless economic behavior. Although economists believe in the benefits of trade, they know, as John Maynard Keynes did, that “beggar-thy-neighbor” trade policies that result in job-losing trade deficits for the U.K. had to be fought with counter-measures. In the absence of a common currency, the preferred policy is a single-country-variable-tariff (our invention) whose rate increases   as the trade deficit widens and falls as trade is brought into balance.

Of course, trade need not be balanced with every nation but should be balanced  with the world of nations. Since the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade was signed in 1994, the USA has had huge deficits with Japan, Germany and the European Union, and China, which amounted to $562 billion in 2016 of a total of $734 billion. This resulted in booming economies in those countries and relatively stagnant growth in the USA accompanied by the loss of millions of high-paying jobs in USA manufacturing. Free trade is possible but not with predators.

We allowed cumulative trade deficits with Germany and the European countries post WWII to prevent them from voting Communist. But Germany and French intellectuals did not want to be dominated by the USA either. Unfortunately for them, the world political situation changed with the onset of the Cold War, and NATO was formed as a defensive-offensive bloc dominated by the good old USA. Economically, the USA continued to allow its former enemies the privilege of enjoying trade surpluses with the USA. By the late 1970s, the USA had changed from being the world’s leading creditor nation to the world’s leading debtor nation!  

Copying, imitating, and improving on your most successful competitor’s products is at its heart of market competition. So much of what China has been doing is to play catching-up, which joining the league of most-favored trading nation facilitated.

The USA alleges that China has been stealing USA trade secrets. Maybe so. But the way lawlessness should be dealt with is by civil or criminal action, not tariffs. What appears to be bad about China’s alleged lawlessness is its failure to respect patent monopolies. Injured parties can seek recourse through the courts. Our leaders appear to believe that international courts are antagonistic to the USA in international proceedings. The principal damage lies in the creation of  trade deficits. But trade deficits are easily corrected by the single-country-variable-tariff. As we proposed its employment, it would apply to all products imported from the trade surplus country and would rise as trade deficits grow and would fall as trade is brought into balance. There is nothing a trade surplus country has to gain from a trade war but has a lot to gain from balanced trade.

Raymond L. Richman, Pittsburgh, PA.

The author is Prof. Emeritus at the Graduate School of Public and International Affairs, the University of Pittsburgh. He holds a Ph.D. in economics from the University of Chicago.

Tel. 412-682-1286

Your Name:

Post a Comment:


Comment by Reader, 1/15/2019:

Good letter!  I hope Feldstein reads it! 

Best Regards,

Jesse Richman




  • Richmans' Blog    RSS
  • Our New Book - Balanced Trade
  • Buy Trading Away Our Future
  • Read Trading Away Our Future
  • Richmans' Commentaries
  • ITA Working Papers
  • ITA on Facebook
  • Contact Us

    Archive
    Sep 2019
    Aug 2019
    Jun 2019
    May 2019
    Apr 2019
    Mar 2019
    February 2019
    Jan 2019

    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010

    Categories:
    Book Reviews
    Capital Gains Taxation
    Corporate Income Tax
    Consumption Taxes
    Economy - Long Term
    Economy - Short Term
    Environmental Regulation
    Last 100 Years
    Politics
    Real Estate Taxation
    Trade

    Miscellaneous

    Outside Links:

  • American Economic Alert
  • American Jobs Alliance
  • Angry Bear Blog
  • Economy in Crisis
  • Econbrowser
  • Emmanuel Goldstein's Blog
  • Levy Economics Institute
  • McKeever Institute
  • Michael Pettis Blog
  • Naked Capitalism
  • Natural Born Conservative
  • Science & Public Policy Inst.
  • TradeReform.org
  • Votersway Blog
  • Watt's Up With That


    Wikipedia:

  • [An] extensive argument for balanced trade, and a program to achieve balanced trade is presented in Trading Away Our Future, by Raymond Richman, Howard Richman and Jesse Richman. “A minimum standard for ensuring that trade does benefit all is that trade should be relatively in balance.” [Balanced Trade entry]

    Journal of Economic Literature:

  • [Trading Away Our Future] Examines the costs and benefits of U.S. trade and tax policies. Discusses why trade deficits matter; root of the trade deficit; the “ostrich” and “eagles” attitudes; how to balance trade; taxation of capital gains; the real estate tax; the corporate income tax; solving the low savings problem; how to protect one’s assets; and a program for a strong America....

    Atlantic Economic Journal:

  • In Trading Away Our Future   Richman ... advocates the immediate adoption of a set of public policy proposal designed to reduce the trade deficit and increase domestic savings.... the set of public policy proposals is a wake-up call... [February 17, 2009 review by T.H. Cate]