Ideal Taxes Association

Raymond Richman       -       Jesse Richman       -       Howard Richman

 Richmans' Trade and Taxes Blog



Bring on the Trade War -- Why the US must, can, and will win a more balanced trading relationship with China
Jesse Richman, 5/8/2019

The liberal trade world that was built after World War II is on the verge of collapse.  And the only politician who can save it is Donald Trump.  And the only way to save it is to win the trade war with China. 

Donald Trump was elected president in part because he recognized the bankruptcy of US trade policy and promised to do something about it.  As negotiations with China enter a difficult and vital phase, America is very lucky to have a president with the gumption and determination to see this fight through.  The trade war with China is one that the US must, can, and will win.  And when it comes to the tariffs proposed so far, the US has not yet begun to fight. China should change course, stop reneging on its negotiated promises, and become a normal capitalist nation.  But if China prefers to remain mercantilist, totalitarian, autocratic, illiberal, and despotic, the US must treat it as it deserves -- to a healthy course of isolation, disinvestment, and containment. 

For decades the United States has been played for a sucker by China's totalitarian masters.  For example, Bill Clinton unwisely let China into the WTO, naively believing that China would democratize.  Instead, China's oligarchy has returned to autocracy, its private enterprises are increasingly coerced by its state-owned enterprises. Its trade policies have been consistently and in diverse ways predatory.  Perhaps it was poetic justice that Bill Clinton's ill advised admission of China to the WTO contributed to Hillary Clinton's defeat in the 2016 election

The admission of China to the WTO initiated long-lasting negative consequences across many parts of the United States and many regions of the US economy.  Innovation, marriage, health, and welfare suffered as a result of the China shock. China leverages all available means to achieve its mercanitlist ends -- from manipulation of its currency, to forced technology transfer, to outright theft.  By 2013 many millions more workers were employed in manufacturing in China than across the entire western world.  

The massive trade surpluses accumulated by China with the United States across several decades have reflected and catalyzed the massive transfer of technological and manufacturing capacity from the free world to China's censored, repressed, firewalled, and very much un-free world.   

And China's totalitarian model of mercantilist development has undermined US political and economic standing around the globe as leaders with authoritarian tendencies have turned towards China's 'model.' Global human freedom is in decline.  In his naivete Bill Clinton boasted that China's repression could never withstand a force so massive as the internet.  Today China is exporting its "great firewall" technology to leaders in other countries who feel threatened by freedom.

Which brings us to Trump and his options. 

Trump could of course take the Biden-Bush-Clinton-Obama option and accept fig-leaf promises of change from China while allowing China to continue its depredations.  Far too many who pretend allegiance to the banner of "free trade" would have him do just that.  But over the last three decades this policy has brought us to the current fix. Free trade with China is like "free trade" with the thief who stole your car.  Keep buying it back from him whilst doing nothing to punish the theft and you will keep getting poorer while confirming the thief in the view that you are an easy mark.  When we buy back our stolen technology, produced in our coerced-away factories through the labor of a nation held in bondage by its corrupt communist rulers we are doing little else. Continuing on this disastrous course will lead to the destruction of the global liberal order including the free trade that so-called defenders claim to cherish.  Indeed, it already is. 

If the current negotiations truly succeed in changing China's behavior, then this could be an excellent outcome. Perhaps China might yet reverse its path.  A constructive China ruled by its people rather than its commissars and engaged in free trade would be a wonderful thing for both China's oppressed citizens and the world.  

But if the negotiations fail, the United States should move to impose increasing tariffs on China's exports.  An important Trump administration legacy should then be institutionalizing policies that force China and other mercantilists to change their behavior.  There are many excellent options the President could implement. One of the best is the scaled tariff which would systematically target China's exports, creating pressure to reduce the trade deficit.  The scaled tariff would discourage China's retaliatory tariffs.  For every dollar China adds to the trade deficit by refusing to buy American products, the scaled tariff will increase the tariffs on China's products.  As the tariff rises, the incentives for manufacturers to move their operations elsewhere will accelerate, increasing pressure on China. Or Trump could impose import quotas accompanied by single country import certificates. This would allow the US government to allocate or auction import rights to particular vital or high need Chinese products while limiting total imports from China to the value of China's imports of US goods.  As the quotas phase in, China's exports to the US will be restricted to match its imports from the US.  As with the scaled tariff, with single-country import certificates China's recent games to hurt American farmers and others will simply mean even fewer Chinese exports to the US.

Ultimately, if Trump hangs tough, China's leader must choose between playing fair and isolation. China will have to choose between joining the liberal world order and reduced access to western markets and technology. China's mercantilism will be Trumped. 

Your Name:

Post a Comment:


Comment by Kev, 5/14/2019:

Thanks for this informative article




  • Richmans' Blog    RSS
  • Our New Book - Balanced Trade
  • Buy Trading Away Our Future
  • Read Trading Away Our Future
  • Richmans' Commentaries
  • ITA Working Papers
  • ITA on Facebook
  • Contact Us

    Archive
    Nov 2019
    Oct 2019
    Sep 2019
    Aug 2019
    Jun 2019
    May 2019

    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010

    Categories:
    Book Reviews
    Capital Gains Taxation
    Corporate Income Tax
    Consumption Taxes
    Economy - Long Term
    Economy - Short Term
    Environmental Regulation
    Last 100 Years
    Politics
    Real Estate Taxation
    Trade

    Miscellaneous

    Outside Links:

  • American Economic Alert
  • American Jobs Alliance
  • Angry Bear Blog
  • Economy in Crisis
  • Econbrowser
  • Emmanuel Goldstein's Blog
  • Levy Economics Institute
  • McKeever Institute
  • Michael Pettis Blog
  • Naked Capitalism
  • Natural Born Conservative
  • Science & Public Policy Inst.
  • TradeReform.org
  • Votersway Blog
  • Watt's Up With That


    Wikipedia:

  • [An] extensive argument for balanced trade, and a program to achieve balanced trade is presented in Trading Away Our Future, by Raymond Richman, Howard Richman and Jesse Richman. “A minimum standard for ensuring that trade does benefit all is that trade should be relatively in balance.” [Balanced Trade entry]

    Journal of Economic Literature:

  • [Trading Away Our Future] Examines the costs and benefits of U.S. trade and tax policies. Discusses why trade deficits matter; root of the trade deficit; the “ostrich” and “eagles” attitudes; how to balance trade; taxation of capital gains; the real estate tax; the corporate income tax; solving the low savings problem; how to protect one’s assets; and a program for a strong America....

    Atlantic Economic Journal:

  • In Trading Away Our Future   Richman ... advocates the immediate adoption of a set of public policy proposal designed to reduce the trade deficit and increase domestic savings.... the set of public policy proposals is a wake-up call... [February 17, 2009 review by T.H. Cate]