Ideal Taxes Association

Raymond Richman       -       Jesse Richman       -       Howard Richman

 Richmans' Trade and Taxes Blog



The Abundance Agenda
Jesse Richman, 1/14/2022

Derek Thompson has a nice piece out in the Atlantic today.  In it he outlines a set of key steps to move away from the current scarcity agenda and towards an abundance agenda.  It's in important idea, and the candidate who can run effectively on the right combination of abundance policies will be well positioned to win the next presidential election.  While not all of Thompson's ideas make complete sense, and he has neglected to diagnose some of the key drivers of the scarcity situation such as massive trade deficits and lack of domestic savings, he is moving in the right direction in terms of highlighting a crucial set of issues that need to be solved. 

You can read it at https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/news/a-simple-plan-to-solve-all-of-americas-problems/ar-AASHnxo 

 

Read more...

Comments: 0


The Senate should reject Jerome Powell -- we're published in today's American Thinker
Howard Richman, 1/11/2022

by Howard Richman and Jesse Richman

Today (January 11), the Senate Banking Committee will hold a hearing on whether Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell should be awarded a second four-year term. The Senate should reject the nomination.

As we explained on April 26, here in the American Thinker (Jerome Powell and the Coming Inflation), Powell doesn’t understand economics. He couldn’t even see the difference between President Trump’s economy in which increased supply made inflation unlikely and President Biden’s economy in which reduced supply made inflation almost inevitable.

Back then, prices were going up at a 2.6% rate according to the most recent release (March 2021) of the Consumer Price Index (CPI). Now, according to the most recent CPI (November 2021), inflation is going up at a 6.8% rate. Tomorrow, the December CPI will be reported and the consensus estimate is that it will go up to 7%.

Jerome Powell has printed too much money, has stoked inflation by cutting supply, has taken incompetent actions against inflation, and is currently creating inflationary expectations that could increase both inflation and unemployment for decades. We will discuss each of these huge mistakes in turn.

Printing Too Much Money

Mismanagement of the money supply by the Fed can have massive consequences for the economy. For instance, in what was arguably the worst Fed mistake ever made, Roy Young and Eugene Meyer presided over a contraction by one-third in the US money supply (1929 to 1932) which greatly extended and intensified the Great Depression.

When Federal Reserve Chair Ben Bernanke encountered the same sort of financial collapse at the beginning of the Great Recession in 2008, he invented quantitative easing (massive buying by the Fed of both short-term and long-term government bonds) to make sure that the US money supply wouldn’t fall. Bernanke succeeded! QE1 (the first version of Quantitative Easing) was a great success.  

Powell responded to the Covid-lockdown recession with a massive quantitative easing effort despite the fact that this was not a money-destroying financial crisis. Where Bernanke’s actions kept the money supply relatively stable despite a financial crisis, Powell’s actions induced the most rapid growth in the US money supply since at least 1960, as seen in the graph:

/images/M2since1960.png

Stoking Inflation by Cutting Supply

Powell is actually taking actions that stoke inflation.  In his renomination message President Biden praised Powell’s belief that “urgent action is needed to address the economic risks posed by climate change,” perhaps a reference to changing finance costs that are reducing oil and gas development.

Powell is thereby accelerating the very inflation that he is supposed to fight when he prevents banks from making loans to fossil fuel developers, loans that would reduce the future prices of energy, increase US energy exports and reduce US energy imports.

Some recent evidence suggests predictions of catastrophic global warming are based upon a mathematical error.  Be that as it may, decreasing the supply of energy is a clear recipe for inflation as demonstrated in the 1970s.

Incompetent Actions Against Inflation

Past Chairs of the Federal Reserve have “tapped on the brakes” when inflation started to rise above 3%, but Powell has refused to do much of anything, relying through most of 2021 on wishful thinking about “transitory” inflation instead of action, and his own untrained intuition instead of economic understanding or the Federal Reserve’s own economics models.  (The sum total of this lawyer’s economics course work was the introductory economics course he took as an undergrad.)

In the early days of the pandemic, the impact of his massive increase in the money supply may have been dampened by a diminished velocity that money changed hands due to lockdowns and other pandemic precautions.  But as the economy has reopened, inflation has too. Basic monetary theory states that a massive increase in the money supply is going to cause inflation. And it is causing it now.

Powell’s planned actions appear likely to be too little and too late. According to Federal Reserve minutes released recently he doesn’t plan to end quantitative easing until March and only plans to raise interest rates three times during 2022, probably by about a quarter percent each time, bringing the US short-term interest rate up to about 0.8%.  This is not nearly enough to make much of a dent in an inflation rate that is much higher than that.

Creating Inflationary Expectations

Powell seems to be intent upon repeating the mistake made by Federal Reserve Chair William McChesney Martin who let inflation rise from 3.0% in 1967 to 4.7% in 1968 to 6.2% in 1969 (according to the CPI). Like Powell, Martin was doing so in order to facilitate the tremendous increase in government spending being made by his president.

In December 1967, while Martin’s inflation rate was climbing, Milton Friedman, then head of the American Economic Association, urged in a speech at its annual meeting (pdf) that the Federal Reserve be required to stick to a target of 3-5% monetary growth. If his recommendation had been followed, the economic malaise of the next 15 years would have been avoided.

The problem is that once the inflation rate gets high enough, inflationary expectations change. Lenders begin demanding higher interest rates and workers begin demanding higher wage rates so as to keep up with inflation. The following graph [used with permission] by conservative economists Paul R. Gregory and Roy J. Ruffin shows that inflationary expectations jumped up in 1969, 1973, and 1979:

/images/phillips.jpg

As shown, each jump upward in inflationary expectations resulted, simultaneously, in a new relationship between inflation and unemployment, with both being generally higher than previously. [Note: The inflation rate shown in the above graph was calculated from the GDP Price Deflator which is more accurate than the CPI, but not reported as quickly.]

Powell is playing with fire. Once inflationary expectations get going, they are very difficult to bring down. After the inflation-ridden 1970s in which the buying power of a dollar dropped by more than 50 percent, it took President Reagan’s supply-side economics combined with Federal Reserve Chair Paul Volcker’s reduced money supply growth to finally bring them down. And, as anyone who lived through that period can attest, it required sky-high interest rates and a painful recession.

The Senate must reject Powell. If they don’t, it will take another supply-side president, such as Ronald Reagan or Donald Trump, and another Paul Volcker at the Fed to bring down the inflationary expectations that the incompetent Jerome Powell is now creating.

---

Click here to read a slightly edited version of this piece on the American Thinker website.

Read more...

Comments: 0





  • Richmans' Blog    RSS
  • Our New Book - Balanced Trade
  • Buy Trading Away Our Future
  • Read Trading Away Our Future
  • Richmans' Commentaries
  • ITA Working Papers
  • ITA on Facebook
  • Contact Us

    Archive
    Jan 2022

    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010

    Categories:
    Book Reviews
    Capital Gains Taxation
    Corporate Income Tax
    Consumption Taxes
    Economy - Long Term
    Economy - Short Term
    Environmental Regulation
    Politics
    Real Estate Taxation
    Trade
    Miscellaneous

    Outside Links:

  • American Economic Alert
  • American Jobs Alliance
  • Angry Bear Blog
  • Economy in Crisis
  • Econbrowser
  • Emmanuel Goldstein's Blog
  • Levy Economics Institute
  • McKeever Institute
  • Michael Pettis Blog
  • Naked Capitalism
  • Natural Born Conservative
  • Science & Public Policy Inst.
  • TradeReform.org
  • Votersway Blog
  • Watt's Up With That


    Wikipedia:

  • [An] extensive argument for balanced trade, and a program to achieve balanced trade is presented in Trading Away Our Future, by Raymond Richman, Howard Richman and Jesse Richman. “A minimum standard for ensuring that trade does benefit all is that trade should be relatively in balance.” [Balanced Trade entry]

    Journal of Economic Literature:

  • [Trading Away Our Future] Examines the costs and benefits of U.S. trade and tax policies. Discusses why trade deficits matter; root of the trade deficit; the “ostrich” and “eagles” attitudes; how to balance trade; taxation of capital gains; the real estate tax; the corporate income tax; solving the low savings problem; how to protect one’s assets; and a program for a strong America....

    Atlantic Economic Journal:

  • In Trading Away Our Future   Richman ... advocates the immediate adoption of a set of public policy proposal designed to reduce the trade deficit and increase domestic savings.... the set of public policy proposals is a wake-up call... [February 17, 2009 review by T.H. Cate]